Landmark Ruling On Historic Lake Oswego House Is A Big Win For Preservationists

Dated: September 29 2016

Views: 368

One of the joys of buying an old home or building is the sense of history that comes with it, a sense that is shared by neighbors and visitors alike.


In a recent case, Lake Oswego Preservation Society v. City of Lake Oswego, the Oregon Supreme Court ruled that structures that retain a pre-existing designation as “historic” cannot be removed from protection simply by request by a subsequent owner.




Carrie Richter is a Portland attorney and owner at Garvey Schubert Barer.
Enlarge

Carrie Richter is a Portland attorney and owner at Garvey Schubert Barer.


Earlier this month, the Oregon Supreme Court interpreted the historic preservation consent law, ORS 197.772, in a landmark case. The court determined that the right to automatic removal of a historic designation from a property applies only to the owners of properties at the time that the designation was imposed — not to owners that acquire a property after a historic designation is already in place.


Local communities have used the designation of local historic landmarks as an essential tool to further land use planning objectives and achieve community sustainability.


The local designation of resources is distinguishable from the National Register of Historic Places list that is a federally run program where regulation is local. Even prior to the adoption of the statewide land use goals, Oregon communities were inventorying and designating historic properties to preserve their communal histories.


Later, the statewide land use planning goals including Goal 5, required local governments to identify and designate historically significant properties and identify the appropriate level of protection for each site.


In 1995, the legislature adopted an owner consent law, ORS 197.772, stipulating that property owners have the right to refuse a request to designate their property as historic. The language used in the 1995 update, and whether it applies to subsequent property owners, is what triggered the course of events that led to this month’s decision.


The case concerned the Carman House, a property added in 1990 by the City of Oswego to its inventory of historic landmarks as a rare and valuable example of a territorial Oregon residence. A subsequent owner of the property filed an application to remove the Carman House's historic designation in 2013, hoping to tear down the aging structure and redevelop.


Source

Blog author image

Mark Ross

For Mark Ross, founder of Ross NW Real Estate and professional real estate broker, real estate has always been the career of choice. During his 30 years in the industry, Mark has gained experience in ....

Latest Blog Posts

10 Ways To Save On A Kitchen Remodel

A kitchen remodel is among the most popular renovation projects for homeowners, but it can quickly become the most expensive. According to HomeAdvisor, the average kitchen remodel costs $25,656, or

Read More

6 Mortgage Tips For Single Homebuyers With Children

If you’re a single parent, it’s arguably more challenging to buy a home than for those in a partnership with dual incomes. Yet it’s easy to see why so many single parents are eager to purchase

Read More

How To Deal With Unsolicited Offers

If you’re one of those lucky people who own a home in a “hot” area, it’s a pretty sweet feeling. You made a good real estate call. If you decide to sell, all signs point to it being an easy

Read More

Homebuying And Mortgage Guide For Singles

Many people might picture homeownership as an event that happens only after two people get married and start a financial partnership. Some mortgages are still structured to reflect that idea. But

Read More